User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45314928-20200606025128/@comment-45314928-20200606141047: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45314928-20200606025128/@comment-45314928-20200606141047'''
Harness has no rights whatsoever to "release" a short story. even if he did specifically write it after seeing fan interest, his tweet-along had long since ended so it had nothing to do with lockdown (and your only evidence that it was licensed is that it somehow had something to do with lockdown).
Harness has no rights whatsoever to "release" a short story. even if he did specifically write it after seeing fan interest, his tweet-along had long since ended so it had nothing to do with lockdown (and your only evidence that it was licensed is that it somehow had something to do with lockdown).
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200606025128-45314928/20200606141047-45314928]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 15:16, 27 April 2023

Harness has no rights whatsoever to "release" a short story. even if he did specifically write it after seeing fan interest, his tweet-along had long since ended so it had nothing to do with lockdown (and your only evidence that it was licensed is that it somehow had something to do with lockdown).