User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45692830-20200510214412/@comment-45692830-20200510221148: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Again, I'd like to note, I'm perfectly okay with this story being valid. I think Scrooge's arguments are perfectly fine, and I think the recent discussion at [[Thread:212365]] shows that Harness has a very broad view of "canon" and enjoys messing with viewers. | Again, I'd like to note, I'm perfectly okay with this story being valid. I think Scrooge's arguments are perfectly fine, and I think the recent discussion at [[Thread:212365]] shows that Harness has a very broad view of "canon" and enjoys messing with viewers. | ||
The story clearly passes rules 1, 2, and 3, and I think given Harness's temperament it passes 4. | The story clearly passes rules 1, 2, and 3, and I think given Harness's temperament it passes 4. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200510214412-45692830/20200510221148-45692830]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:20, 27 April 2023
Again, I'd like to note, I'm perfectly okay with this story being valid. I think Scrooge's arguments are perfectly fine, and I think the recent discussion at Thread:212365 shows that Harness has a very broad view of "canon" and enjoys messing with viewers.
The story clearly passes rules 1, 2, and 3, and I think given Harness's temperament it passes 4.
