User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170222095120/@comment-4028641-20170224102758: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
5.2.105.85 wrote: | 5.2.105.85 wrote: | ||
| Line 6: | Line 5: | ||
To me this kinda proves that the BBC doesn't have a problem with re-printing images from this story, so we shouldn't either. | To me this kinda proves that the BBC doesn't have a problem with re-printing images from this story, so we shouldn't either. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170222095120-5.2.105.85/20170224102758-4028641]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:23, 27 April 2023
5.2.105.85 wrote: The BBC may not be allowed to rebroadcast it but in a following Doctor Who Yearbook where Pertwee appears on the cover. There are many screengrabs to DIT, which 100% that they are still allowed to sell images of it even if they can't sell the video.
To me this kinda proves that the BBC doesn't have a problem with re-printing images from this story, so we shouldn't either.
