User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170222095120/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170222100048: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170222095120/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170222100048'''
I'm going to also add that many reasons for dismissal is that it's plain and simply just not liked - again, I really don't believe that that's a reason for dismissal.  
I'm going to also add that many reasons for dismissal is that it's plain and simply just not liked - again, I really don't believe that that's a reason for dismissal.  


When thinking of reasons to counter argue, bear in mind my other points, and just pretend that this is a brilliant story, don't let its rubbishness be a reason for invalidness... ever.
When thinking of reasons to counter argue, bear in mind my other points, and just pretend that this is a brilliant story, don't let its rubbishness be a reason for invalidness... ever.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170222095120-5.2.105.85/20170222100048-5.2.105.85]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 15:24, 27 April 2023

I'm going to also add that many reasons for dismissal is that it's plain and simply just not liked - again, I really don't believe that that's a reason for dismissal.

When thinking of reasons to counter argue, bear in mind my other points, and just pretend that this is a brilliant story, don't let its rubbishness be a reason for invalidness... ever.