User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170309095026/@comment-4028641-20170309151726: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''Attack of the Graske'' partially fails because one of the characters is the audience. | ''Attack of the Graske'' partially fails because one of the characters is the audience. | ||
| Line 11: | Line 10: | ||
I'll give you ''TT'' I guess. But I feel like we'd need better examples to set any kind of "trend." | I'll give you ''TT'' I guess. But I feel like we'd need better examples to set any kind of "trend." | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170309095026-5.2.105.85/20170309151726-4028641]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:24, 27 April 2023
Attack of the Graske partially fails because one of the characters is the audience.
But I still think it's important to set up new ideas for further coverage of stories, and for the most part this idea makes some sense.
Whodle fails because when you die you regenerate.
I think this concept would work with stories where there are a couple different endings that you can find. But, in the case of Doctor Who and the Warlord: "There were several puzzles to complete with two hundred fifty different locations in each part."
Woa, is that more than 200 different ways to play the game? Eggggghhh we can't do that...
I'll give you TT I guess. But I feel like we'd need better examples to set any kind of "trend."
