User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5545417-20150725190725/@comment-1432718-20150729034036: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
We need to use the "four little rules" located at [[Tardis:Valid sources]] to determine any story's validity. | We need to use the "four little rules" located at [[Tardis:Valid sources]] to determine any story's validity. | ||
| Line 8: | Line 7: | ||
I suggest anyone who hasn't read the guidelines for valid sources please do so. There is a longer description of each point than what I posted here. | I suggest anyone who hasn't read the guidelines for valid sources please do so. There is a longer description of each point than what I posted here. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20150725190725-5545417/20150729034036-1432718]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:26, 27 April 2023
We need to use the "four little rules" located at Tardis:Valid sources to determine any story's validity.
- Are these stories? I'm not at all familiar with these but it sounds like there's no argument here (please correct me if I'm wrong).
- Is it commercially licensed by all relevant copyright holders? That would have to be answered by someone familiar with the stories.
- Have these stories been officially released? Once again, it seems like there's no argument here.
- Is it intended to be set outside the DWU? This seems like the question that will generate the most debate on this issue.
I suggest anyone who hasn't read the guidelines for valid sources please do so. There is a longer description of each point than what I posted here.
