User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5791028-20150709160234: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO | Forum Archive | Inclusion debates
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5\2/\4-\3)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{retitle|Inclusion debates/Lego Dimensions}} | |||
As I expect most of you know, Doctor Who will be part of the upcoming Lego Dimensions video game. It includes the Twelfth Doctor, Clara, Missy, Daleks and Cybermen. Now, clearly, we can't consider this part of the DWU for obvious reasons. First and foremost, it's a crossover with other properties like Batman, Lord of the Rings and the Lego Movie. But should we have an article for it with the Invalid Source tag placed at the top? | As I expect most of you know, Doctor Who will be part of the upcoming Lego Dimensions video game. It includes the Twelfth Doctor, Clara, Missy, Daleks and Cybermen. Now, clearly, we can't consider this part of the DWU for obvious reasons. First and foremost, it's a crossover with other properties like Batman, Lord of the Rings and the Lego Movie. But should we have an article for it with the Invalid Source tag placed at the top? | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20150709160234-5791028]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:30, 27 April 2023
As I expect most of you know, Doctor Who will be part of the upcoming Lego Dimensions video game. It includes the Twelfth Doctor, Clara, Missy, Daleks and Cybermen. Now, clearly, we can't consider this part of the DWU for obvious reasons. First and foremost, it's a crossover with other properties like Batman, Lord of the Rings and the Lego Movie. But should we have an article for it with the Invalid Source tag placed at the top?
