User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5791028-20150709160234/@comment-4028641-20151008210651: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
Danniesen wrote: | Danniesen wrote: | ||
| Line 6: | Line 5: | ||
I suppose it should be brought into consideration ''how'' we write the behind-the-scenes and the invalid pages if we make them. There are two kinds -- where we write it from an out-of-universe perspective about the story's character (ex. [[Gareth Jenkins]], [[Ozmo]]) or if we write it as if were a valid article but put the invalid tag on and explain why it is invalid in the "behind the scenes" section (ex. [[The Valeyard (He Jests at Scars...)]], [[Ninth Doctor (Scream of the Shalka)]], and most invalid character articles) | I suppose it should be brought into consideration ''how'' we write the behind-the-scenes and the invalid pages if we make them. There are two kinds -- where we write it from an out-of-universe perspective about the story's character (ex. [[Gareth Jenkins]], [[Ozmo]]) or if we write it as if were a valid article but put the invalid tag on and explain why it is invalid in the "behind the scenes" section (ex. [[The Valeyard (He Jests at Scars...)]], [[Ninth Doctor (Scream of the Shalka)]], and most invalid character articles) | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20150709160234-5791028/20151008210651-4028641]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:32, 27 April 2023
Danniesen wrote: Should we take it up for consideration on how long an article can be? Creating one single article would certainly save us time from creating multiple articles, which we do not strive to do either.
I suppose it should be brought into consideration how we write the behind-the-scenes and the invalid pages if we make them. There are two kinds -- where we write it from an out-of-universe perspective about the story's character (ex. Gareth Jenkins, Ozmo) or if we write it as if were a valid article but put the invalid tag on and explain why it is invalid in the "behind the scenes" section (ex. The Valeyard (He Jests at Scars...), Ninth Doctor (Scream of the Shalka), and most invalid character articles)
