User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-79.68.246.214-20131114171340: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5\2/\4-\3))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-79.68.246.214-20131114171340'''
{{retitle|Inclusion debates/Loom}}
We know from doctor who books that Galifreyans "Loomed" themselves and created cousins which were born as adults which behaved like children but how do we explain that the doctor has a cot and the master appears as a child in flashback. this is a massive problem since the books are considered canon and intended to be DWU so what is the main descision about the problem. {{retitle|///Loom}}
We know from doctor who books that Galifreyans "Loomed" themselves and created cousins which were born as adults which behaved like children but how do we explain that the doctor has a cot and the master appears as a child in flashback. this is a massive problem since the books are considered canon and intended to be DWU so what is the main descision about the problem.  
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20131114171340-79.68.246.214]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 15:37, 27 April 2023

We know from doctor who books that Galifreyans "Loomed" themselves and created cousins which were born as adults which behaved like children but how do we explain that the doctor has a cot and the master appears as a child in flashback. this is a massive problem since the books are considered canon and intended to be DWU so what is the main descision about the problem.