User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-95.145.155.227-20171125234745/@comment-31010985-20180225212833: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
That's fine. | That's fine. | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
The majority agreed with said sandbox but when people didn't they posted their opinion and then that one controversial poem was debated, again so it wasn't necessary to discuss every single poem. Only the ones that were potentially unclear in regards to validity. | The majority agreed with said sandbox but when people didn't they posted their opinion and then that one controversial poem was debated, again so it wasn't necessary to discuss every single poem. Only the ones that were potentially unclear in regards to validity. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20171125234745-95.145.155.227/20180225212833-31010985]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:40, 27 April 2023
That's fine.
Just to be clear when I was listing the poems that could be ruled invalid based on the arguments and comments in the thread. It's hard to move the conversation forwards when covering an anthology of 50+ stories and especially so if we were to discuss them one at a time. Instead I sorted the stories into categories (and put it on my sandbox) so that that could be brought to the discussion instead on arguing about each individually.
The majority agreed with said sandbox but when people didn't they posted their opinion and then that one controversial poem was debated, again so it wasn't necessary to discuss every single poem. Only the ones that were potentially unclear in regards to validity.
