User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-6032121-20200517150418/@comment-45692830-20200520204143

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-6032121-20200517150418/@comment-45692830-20200520204143 Let's consider his second comment there. What is he responding to? He's responding to you listing a set of stories that need to be reclassified. And he's saying "wait, no, some of these don't need to be reclassified, they can go on one of these lists because they're BBC products". This is, again, not an endorsement of your proposed solution. It's merely pointing out that within your proposed solution you had made a mistake.

As for Scrooge not suggesting that Shadow Passes be included, I'll direct you back to my quote that you ignored.

Or, you know, his explicit statement in Talk:How The Monk Got His Habit (short story) that he considered it a Lockdown! story.

"Cook may have stated that the Tweetalongs weren't a Doctor Who Magazine-endorsed project per se, but clearly some sort of agreement exists with the BBC, since some of the stories were released on the official Doctor Who YouTube channel or the BBC website, with no specific logic to which ones (one chapter of Paul Cornell's "Shadow" trilogy was released on the BBC website, then the other two were released on the Lockdown YouTube channel)."

Obviously this exchange took place before the thread, but in context with the quote, well. Look. The point is this. Consensus clearly does not exist. At best consensus exists that some split should happen, but people do not agree on how the split should be handled. To say otherwise is just a misrepresentation of the thread. There's still a lot of things people can discuss, even if some of them might be better served in a new thread related to validity of Lockdown! stories more generally.