228,854
edits
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1317169-20121202170842/@comment-188432-20130119154014: Difference between revisions
More actions
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1317169-20121202170842/@comment-188432-20130119154014 (edit)
Revision as of 20:46, 27 April 2023
, 27 April 2023Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
Tangerineduel wrote: | Tangerineduel wrote: | ||
| Line 9: | Line 8: | ||
That kinda goes against the whole spirit of the wiki — which, to my mind, is to make note of individual references and gradually assemble a more complete idea of that topic's overall place in the DWU. Having an entire section of an article declaring "these things ''only'' appear in this story" is just ... wrong. Not to mention arrogant. | That kinda goes against the whole spirit of the wiki — which, to my mind, is to make note of individual references and gradually assemble a more complete idea of that topic's overall place in the DWU. Having an entire section of an article declaring "these things ''only'' appear in this story" is just ... wrong. Not to mention arrogant. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20121202170842-1317169/20130119154014-188432]]</noinclude> | ||