231,276
edits
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1317169-20121202170842/@comment-188432-20130317203757 (edit)
Revision as of 20:46, 27 April 2023
, 27 April 2023Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Theories ''should'' go up in smoke. Speculation is disallowed. You're undervaluing the place of the topic page itself. These are articles about stories; they aren't meant to replace or even do anything remotely similar to topic pages. You want info about [[banana]], go to [[banana]]. Don't list it all at ''[[The Girl in the Fireplace]]''. That's a total misuse of the page. | Theories ''should'' go up in smoke. Speculation is disallowed. You're undervaluing the place of the topic page itself. These are articles about stories; they aren't meant to replace or even do anything remotely similar to topic pages. You want info about [[banana]], go to [[banana]]. Don't list it all at ''[[The Girl in the Fireplace]]''. That's a total misuse of the page. | ||
| Line 13: | Line 12: | ||
Oh and I think you're wrong in your second paragraph. The thing that binds these sentences together is "continuity" in general. You ''can'' write a paragraph that has sentences that appear disparate ''because they're all about continuity''. Remember, we're talking real world articles here, so the tie that binds is the fact that we're talking continuity — not necessarily that one sentence is related to the other ''as topics within the DWU''. What relates them is that they are all aspects of TGITF that weave into the broader continuity of DW. | Oh and I think you're wrong in your second paragraph. The thing that binds these sentences together is "continuity" in general. You ''can'' write a paragraph that has sentences that appear disparate ''because they're all about continuity''. Remember, we're talking real world articles here, so the tie that binds is the fact that we're talking continuity — not necessarily that one sentence is related to the other ''as topics within the DWU''. What relates them is that they are all aspects of TGITF that weave into the broader continuity of DW. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20121202170842-1317169/20130317203757-188432]]</noinclude> | ||