User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1783865-20200302103744/@comment-1783865-20200303084034: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1783865-20200302103744/@comment-1783865-20200303084034'''
The Doctor was not named a Time Lord until ''The War Games'', should that then also mean that he did not become a Time Lord until that specific story? ''The Time Warrior'' was the first story to name the Doctor's planet Gallifrey, does that mean that until that specific story the planet had no name? No. Because knowledge changes as the show is expanding.
The Doctor was not named a Time Lord until ''The War Games'', should that then also mean that he did not become a Time Lord until that specific story? ''The Time Warrior'' was the first story to name the Doctor's planet Gallifrey, does that mean that until that specific story the planet had no name? No. Because knowledge changes as the show is expanding.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20200302103744-1783865/20200303084034-1783865]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 21:16, 27 April 2023

The Doctor was not named a Time Lord until The War Games, should that then also mean that he did not become a Time Lord until that specific story? The Time Warrior was the first story to name the Doctor's planet Gallifrey, does that mean that until that specific story the planet had no name? No. Because knowledge changes as the show is expanding.