User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130110024510: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5\2/\4-\3, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130110024510'''
{{retitle|The Panopticon/Is our wiki Tardis or TARDIS?}}
In the [[Thread:117468|debate over changing the wiki name]], I know that [[user:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] indicated his preference, along with several other users, that "Tardis Data Core" was to be represented as "TARDIS Data Core".
In the [[Thread:117468|debate over changing the wiki name]], I know that [[user:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] indicated his preference, along with several other users, that "Tardis Data Core" was to be represented as "TARDIS Data Core".


Line 8: Line 8:
Feel free, therefore, to use this thread to discuss why [[T:TARDIS]] is an unreasonable rule that must be rewritten.   
Feel free, therefore, to use this thread to discuss why [[T:TARDIS]] is an unreasonable rule that must be rewritten.   


However, simply saying "I don't like Tardis over TARDIS" is not enough.  You must give a ''reason'' why that's a bad way to distinguish between the wiki and the in-universe device, especially given that our project [[namespace]] is "Tardis", not "TARDIS".  Also, please make sure you have familiarised yourself with the arguments at [[TARDIS#Behind the scenes]].  {{retitle|///Is our wiki Tardis or TARDIS?}}
However, simply saying "I don't like Tardis over TARDIS" is not enough.  You must give a ''reason'' why that's a bad way to distinguish between the wiki and the in-universe device, especially given that our project [[namespace]] is "Tardis", not "TARDIS".  Also, please make sure you have familiarised yourself with the arguments at [[TARDIS#Behind the scenes]].   
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130110024510-188432]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 21:35, 27 April 2023

In the debate over changing the wiki name, I know that Tangerineduel indicated his preference, along with several other users, that "Tardis Data Core" was to be represented as "TARDIS Data Core".

My moves in the past few hours to seemingly ignore that and go ahead with "Tardis Data Core" are not refutations of community will. Rather, they are merely upholding T:BOUND and T:TARDIS.

The way the applicable policy is now written, the name must be written "Tardis Data Core" because we are bound to use policy as it is currently written until such time as policy is changed.

Feel free, therefore, to use this thread to discuss why T:TARDIS is an unreasonable rule that must be rewritten.

However, simply saying "I don't like Tardis over TARDIS" is not enough. You must give a reason why that's a bad way to distinguish between the wiki and the in-universe device, especially given that our project namespace is "Tardis", not "TARDIS". Also, please make sure you have familiarised yourself with the arguments at TARDIS#Behind the scenes.