User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-1166667-20130331232539: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-1166667-20130331232539'''
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote">
SmallerOnTheOutside wrote:
SmallerOnTheOutside wrote:
Line 9: Line 8:
</div>
</div>
There's no implication of marriage by calling them her mother and her father.  And unless we want to go back and check that there are no ambiguous mother/father pairs, I don't see what those pages warrant renaming.  It will be obvious quickly in each article that they are separate and disconnected.
There's no implication of marriage by calling them her mother and her father.  And unless we want to go back and check that there are no ambiguous mother/father pairs, I don't see what those pages warrant renaming.  It will be obvious quickly in each article that they are separate and disconnected.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130129081336-188432/20130331232539-1166667]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 21:40, 27 April 2023

SmallerOnTheOutside wrote: I don't really understand how you can completely dismiss the modern Snowmen, the Prequel, and the Bells Clara's being distinct, yet claim that there's no evidence that the rest aren't the same woman.

Until we meet Clara's friend or Clara's mother, or have Bells Clara remember her childhood meeting with the Doctor, we can't really link them as the same life. And I highly doubt those narrative elements will ever get revisited.

I think we should also consider the names of the articles related to Clara. Having Clara's mother and Clara's father implies that they're married and the parents of the same Clara. But they're not.

There's no implication of marriage by calling them her mother and her father. And unless we want to go back and check that there are no ambiguous mother/father pairs, I don't see what those pages warrant renaming. It will be obvious quickly in each article that they are separate and disconnected.