User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-1166667-20130401051841: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-1166667-20130401051841'''
OS: I only bring it up because the logic being used to support merging all the Claras flies in the face of our already-established practices with similar cases like that of the Rorys.
OS: I only bring it up because the logic being used to support merging all the Claras flies in the face of our already-established practices with similar cases like that of the Rorys.


Line 10: Line 9:


We '''CANNOT''' assume that three women who live in different time periods are the same woman.  You are taking the side of the ''unlikelier possibility'', that one woman is transcending spacetime.  There is more proof that they are different than that they are the same.
We '''CANNOT''' assume that three women who live in different time periods are the same woman.  You are taking the side of the ''unlikelier possibility'', that one woman is transcending spacetime.  There is more proof that they are different than that they are the same.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130129081336-188432/20130401051841-1166667]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 21:40, 27 April 2023

OS: I only bring it up because the logic being used to support merging all the Claras flies in the face of our already-established practices with similar cases like that of the Rorys.

SmallerOnTheOutside wrote: Clara's situation is "impossible," but true. Even the Doctor doesn't contradict the facts. But it's something new, something he'd never encountered before. He can't explain it, but he sees the connection. We can't explain how she can be the same person. According to so-called 'common sense', she can't be. But she clearly is!

And how do we know it's true? The whole point of her is that she is a mystery. Literally the arc of the next two months is going to be about her impossible existence.

We CANNOT assume that three women who live in different time periods are the same woman. You are taking the side of the unlikelier possibility, that one woman is transcending spacetime. There is more proof that they are different than that they are the same.