User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-26975268-20130129192945: Difference between revisions
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Okay. Though I think it's kid of unfair your way as one side (yours) clearly has an advantage: if there's no consensus either way, you win. | Okay. Though I think it's kid of unfair your way as one side (yours) clearly has an advantage: if there's no consensus either way, you win. | ||
| Line 7: | Line 6: | ||
It would be wrong to say definitively that they're the same person. Which is why I like the way it's done now: separate articles, with this sentence: "''She was one of the three known people who the [[Eleventh Doctor]] claimed were one and the same, along with [[Clara Oswald]] and [[Clara (The Snowmen)|Clara]].''" That's as definitive as you can get, without speculating. | It would be wrong to say definitively that they're the same person. Which is why I like the way it's done now: separate articles, with this sentence: "''She was one of the three known people who the [[Eleventh Doctor]] claimed were one and the same, along with [[Clara Oswald]] and [[Clara (The Snowmen)|Clara]].''" That's as definitive as you can get, without speculating. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130129081336-188432/20130129192945-26975268]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 21:44, 27 April 2023
Okay. Though I think it's kid of unfair your way as one side (yours) clearly has an advantage: if there's no consensus either way, you win.
Anyways, I'm yet to hear an real reason that explains why it specifically shouldn't be two articles, rather than just opposing our reasons.
In response to your second to last post (I'm behind), just because the Doctor thinks something is a certain way, that doesn't mean that in-universe, it's true. "Never mind; forget all my previous theories." This is just the Doctor's first theory. The Doctor has been wrong before.
It would be wrong to say definitively that they're the same person. Which is why I like the way it's done now: separate articles, with this sentence: "She was one of the three known people who the Eleventh Doctor claimed were one and the same, along with Clara Oswald and Clara." That's as definitive as you can get, without speculating.
