User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-26975268-20130401033117: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-26975268-20130401033117'''
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote">
Witoki wrote:
Witoki wrote:
Line 8: Line 7:


You can't really apply the logic of the real world to the DWU.
You can't really apply the logic of the real world to the DWU.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130129081336-188432/20130401033117-26975268]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 21:45, 27 April 2023

Witoki wrote: Her dying twice on-screen is pretty good proof the Doctor is wrong.

Clearly, you're not very familiar with the Whoniverse. Even just from the Moffat era, it's a world with Gangers and Teselecta. With memory worms and resurrection devices. It's really not that far fetched that she died twice.

You can't really apply the logic of the real world to the DWU.