User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-26975268-20130401042332: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-26975268-20130401042332'''
Okay, I'll play along and show you the faults. Let's sag we keep them split. In that case, we have no proof that end-of-Snowmen Clara, Prequel Clara and Bells Clarra are the same.
Okay, I'll play along and show you the faults. Let's sag we keep them split. In that case, we have no proof that end-of-Snowmen Clara, Prequel Clara and Bells Clarra are the same.


Line 11: Line 10:


So you see, even ''ignoring'' that fact that the only evidence we have is the Doctpr's words, we can't split them because of naming issues!
So you see, even ''ignoring'' that fact that the only evidence we have is the Doctpr's words, we can't split them because of naming issues!
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130129081336-188432/20130401042332-26975268]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 21:46, 27 April 2023

Okay, I'll play along and show you the faults. Let's sag we keep them split. In that case, we have no proof that end-of-Snowmen Clara, Prequel Clara and Bells Clarra are the same.

Therefore, we'd end up with something like this:

As if that's not bad enough, what if there's another one? No. Titles too confusing, for starters. Not gonna happen.

So you see, even ignoring that fact that the only evidence we have is the Doctpr's words, we can't split them because of naming issues!