User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-20607870-20161009184857: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO | Forum Archive
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5\2/\4-\3, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{retitle|The Panopticon/Category}} | |||
Would I be able to create a category for 'Non DWU actors' and/or 'Non DWU Audio actors' for the Unbounds that aren't Valid. | Would I be able to create a category for 'Non DWU actors' and/or 'Non DWU Audio actors' for the Unbounds that aren't Valid. | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I'll be happy to create it if so. It seems a good idea and fits in with policy. | I'll be happy to create it if so. It seems a good idea and fits in with policy. | ||
So guys, what do you think? | So guys, what do you think? | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20161009184857-20607870]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 22:20, 27 April 2023
Would I be able to create a category for 'Non DWU actors' and/or 'Non DWU Audio actors' for the Unbounds that aren't Valid.
Reason being it'll determine which actors have been involved in that medium and which aren't.
I'll be happy to create it if so. It seems a good idea and fits in with policy.
So guys, what do you think?
