229,659
edits
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5/-, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4)) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{retitle|The Panopticon/Doctor Who, Torchwood and UNIT prefixes}} | |||
I know it's consense that we ditch ''Doctor Who'' prefixes on stories/products that have it as a prefix. ([[The Adventure Games (video game)|Doctor Who: The Adventure Games]], et al.) | I know it's consense that we ditch ''Doctor Who'' prefixes on stories/products that have it as a prefix. ([[The Adventure Games (video game)|Doctor Who: The Adventure Games]], et al.) | ||
Apparently, we're also doing it for ''Torchwood'' as a prefix. ([[Outbreak (audio story)|Torchwood: Outbreak]]) | Apparently, we're also doing it for ''Torchwood'' as a prefix. ([[Outbreak (audio story)|Torchwood: Outbreak]]) | ||
However, what I don't understand is: why are we '''not''' removing ''UNIT'' from article pages? Why aren't we naming [[Extinction (audio anthology)|Extinction]] simply ''Extinction (audio anthology)''? | However, what I don't understand is: why are we '''not''' removing ''UNIT'' from article pages? Why aren't we naming [[Extinction (audio anthology)|Extinction]] simply ''Extinction (audio anthology)''? | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20161123164500-25117610]]</noinclude> |