User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-25117610-20180302210944/@comment-5918438-20180307014804: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-25117610-20180302210944/@comment-5918438-20180307014804'''
I agree with the proposition here.
I agree with the proposition here.


Line 5: Line 4:


The best thing to do, I think, is to get rid of this template. One template for each medium is not in the spirit of NPOV.
The best thing to do, I think, is to get rid of this template. One template for each medium is not in the spirit of NPOV.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20180302210944-25117610/20180307014804-5918438]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 22:38, 27 April 2023

I agree with the proposition here.

It would not be practical to follow T:NPOV through and list all Time Lords. We have enough trouble determining companions, so figuring out "important" Time Lords sounds like a whole new unnecessary squabble. Perhaps we might simply include all Time Lords with two or more appearances? Three or more?

The best thing to do, I think, is to get rid of this template. One template for each medium is not in the spirit of NPOV.