User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20151101035254/@comment-1293767-20160106044732: Difference between revisions
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I agree that Petronella should not be used unless future in-universe evidence comes to light showing she was telling the truth. With BF's UNIT series, that may stand a chance of happening, but until then, no. | I agree that Petronella should not be used unless future in-universe evidence comes to light showing she was telling the truth. With BF's UNIT series, that may stand a chance of happening, but until then, no. | ||
| Line 14: | Line 13: | ||
I'm not sure how that would work with contradicting stories, but a look at the page in question doesn't list any other stories stating his first name was something different (and a couple days after your post, someone moved the page to [[Harry Osgood]] anyway). | I'm not sure how that would work with contradicting stories, but a look at the page in question doesn't list any other stories stating his first name was something different (and a couple days after your post, someone moved the page to [[Harry Osgood]] anyway). | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20151101035254-4028641/20160106044732-1293767]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 23:24, 27 April 2023
I agree that Petronella should not be used unless future in-universe evidence comes to light showing she was telling the truth. With BF's UNIT series, that may stand a chance of happening, but until then, no.
Amorkuz wrote: Hmmm... I feel bad for Osgood (The Seeds of Death) now. His first name was also given (in a novelisation) as Harry, but his page is not called Harry Osgood, whereas Tom Osgood's is because the name Tom was given in a book. Is there some policy making novelisations of lesser importance than original books? (Still on-topic for Osgood, hopefully.)
The opposite, actually. According to T:IU:
4.All narratives, regardless of medium, have equal weight. Whether it's a comic strip, audio, novel or television story, it's all equally valid here.
I'm not sure how that would work with contradicting stories, but a look at the page in question doesn't list any other stories stating his first name was something different (and a couple days after your post, someone moved the page to Harry Osgood anyway).
