231,276
edits
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20170429113135 (edit)
Revision as of 23:28, 27 April 2023
, 27 April 2023Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5\2/\4-\3, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4)
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5/-, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{retitle|The Panopticon/Width, Size, and .png images}} | |||
I am perplexed by a minor reverse-loophole in the system that I must take opposition towards. | I am perplexed by a minor reverse-loophole in the system that I must take opposition towards. | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
The problem is that it is very difficult to get a .png file to be above 250px wide while still being below 100kb in size. I currently have one image just teetering at 252px wide, and yet it is still 113kb in size. Thus, I can not upload it. | The problem is that it is very difficult to get a .png file to be above 250px wide while still being below 100kb in size. I currently have one image just teetering at 252px wide, and yet it is still 113kb in size. Thus, I can not upload it. | ||
Which of these three rules should be followed? Shall we list an exception just for transparent .png images? Because the three can not co-exist. | Which of these three rules should be followed? Shall we list an exception just for transparent .png images? Because the three can not co-exist. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20170429113135-4028641]]</noinclude> | ||