User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-44988386-20200416234118/@comment-45692830-20200526232049: Difference between revisions
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
Never Forget The Day The 456 Arrived wrote: | Never Forget The Day The 456 Arrived wrote: | ||
| Line 8: | Line 7: | ||
I very clearly did not go off topic in my comment, given that I said "[a]s for treating them differently than their straight counterparts", something you brought up, and then in the next section said "Moffat's comments on color blind casting are illustrative here", using this section as evidence for the broader point I was making. So this is on topic. | I very clearly did not go off topic in my comment, given that I said "[a]s for treating them differently than their straight counterparts", something you brought up, and then in the next section said "Moffat's comments on color blind casting are illustrative here", using this section as evidence for the broader point I was making. So this is on topic. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20200416234118-44988386/20200526232049-45692830]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 23:38, 27 April 2023
Never Forget The Day The 456 Arrived wrote: Yeah, if we're going to do these categories, just doing Non-Heterosexual individuals and Non-Cisgender individuals would probably be a lot simpler and more streamlined than my original proposal.
So the original proposal was rejected by its author in favor of the one I mentioned as "the current proposal", the one you didn't address and hence were "misunderstanding", in my comment, that I attempted to clarify.
I very clearly did not go off topic in my comment, given that I said "[a]s for treating them differently than their straight counterparts", something you brought up, and then in the next section said "Moffat's comments on color blind casting are illustrative here", using this section as evidence for the broader point I was making. So this is on topic.
