User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-44988386-20200812182239/@comment-45692830-20200812220701: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
For instance, without bringing up the larger issue of the validity of the lockdown content, which, dear lord, is a larger conversation that we really need to get back to eventually, it's not immediately obvious that 13 in [[The Terror of the Umpty Ums (short story)|The Terror of the Umpty Ums]] or [[Doctors Assemble! (webcast)|Doctors Assemble!]] acts as she does normally. But does that mean we think this is a distinct character? Or just different characterization on the part of the writers? | For instance, without bringing up the larger issue of the validity of the lockdown content, which, dear lord, is a larger conversation that we really need to get back to eventually, it's not immediately obvious that 13 in [[The Terror of the Umpty Ums (short story)|The Terror of the Umpty Ums]] or [[Doctors Assemble! (webcast)|Doctors Assemble!]] acts as she does normally. But does that mean we think this is a distinct character? Or just different characterization on the part of the writers? | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20200812182239-44988386/20200812220701-45692830]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 23:41, 27 April 2023
For instance, without bringing up the larger issue of the validity of the lockdown content, which, dear lord, is a larger conversation that we really need to get back to eventually, it's not immediately obvious that 13 in The Terror of the Umpty Ums or Doctors Assemble! acts as she does normally. But does that mean we think this is a distinct character? Or just different characterization on the part of the writers?
