User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-45314928-20200610043202/@comment-33695797-20200610173900: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
That's a rather stubborn stance to take. I have yet to see evidence it did exist either. You state this as fact, and you may believe it, but do you have proof? If you do, could you please provide it? (Aside from the fact that Harness claims it's a discarded novelisation, which Scrooge, Najawin and I have said can reasonably, though not 100% certainly, be seen as a framing device. Because that quote is uncertain, what else is there?) | That's a rather stubborn stance to take. I have yet to see evidence it did exist either. You state this as fact, and you may believe it, but do you have proof? If you do, could you please provide it? (Aside from the fact that Harness claims it's a discarded novelisation, which Scrooge, Najawin and I have said can reasonably, though not 100% certainly, be seen as a framing device. Because that quote is uncertain, what else is there?) | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20200610043202-45314928/20200610173900-33695797]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 23:43, 27 April 2023
That's a rather stubborn stance to take. I have yet to see evidence it did exist either. You state this as fact, and you may believe it, but do you have proof? If you do, could you please provide it? (Aside from the fact that Harness claims it's a discarded novelisation, which Scrooge, Najawin and I have said can reasonably, though not 100% certainly, be seen as a framing device. Because that quote is uncertain, what else is there?)
