User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-45314928-20200610043202/@comment-45314928-20200723195339: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-45314928-20200610043202/@comment-45314928-20200723195339'''
With all due respect you come into these discussions and accuse people of personal attacks all the time (which is not assuming good faith in itself?) but never give any examples. I do not believe that I have personally attacked anyone here, nor do I feel personally attacked (although ironically one time when I did feel personally attacked and came to you my compliant was ignored completely, and eventually archived).
With all due respect you come into these discussions and accuse people of personal attacks all the time (which is not assuming good faith in itself?) but never give any examples. I do not believe that I have personally attacked anyone here, nor do I feel personally attacked (although ironically one time when I did feel personally attacked and came to you my compliant was ignored completely, and eventually archived).


If you want discussions to be condensed that’s one thing, but accusing people of personally attacking each other when they’re simply putting their individual points across is incredibly misleading.
If you want discussions to be condensed that’s one thing, but accusing people of personally attacking each other when they’re simply putting their individual points across is incredibly misleading.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20200610043202-45314928/20200723195339-45314928]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 23:43, 27 April 2023

With all due respect you come into these discussions and accuse people of personal attacks all the time (which is not assuming good faith in itself?) but never give any examples. I do not believe that I have personally attacked anyone here, nor do I feel personally attacked (although ironically one time when I did feel personally attacked and came to you my compliant was ignored completely, and eventually archived).

If you want discussions to be condensed that’s one thing, but accusing people of personally attacking each other when they’re simply putting their individual points across is incredibly misleading.