User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-5791028-20150117172224/@comment-1432718-20150605032749: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
184.147.8.78 wrote: | 184.147.8.78 wrote: | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
See [[Thread:125464]] for the explanation for why Vienna is not included on the wiki. I also suggest you read [[Tardis:Valid sources]] for an explanation of the wiki's policy on what we include. | See [[Thread:125464]] for the explanation for why Vienna is not included on the wiki. I also suggest you read [[Tardis:Valid sources]] for an explanation of the wiki's policy on what we include. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20150117172224-5791028/20150605032749-1432718]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 23:52, 27 April 2023
184.147.8.78 wrote: I can't see why vienna is specifically singled out as not DWU as Graceless is essentially in the same situation (both originated in the Main range, spun off into their own range, and both are stated to be outside the DWU by their line producers) yet Graceless is in and Vienna is out?
See Thread:125464 for the explanation for why Vienna is not included on the wiki. I also suggest you read Tardis:Valid sources for an explanation of the wiki's policy on what we include.
