User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-5791028-20171230034337/@comment-1432718-20180101045817: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Actually, this was addressed by [[User:CzechOut]] in [[Thread:220978]], in which his closing argument states: | Actually, this was addressed by [[User:CzechOut]] in [[Thread:220978]], in which his closing argument states: | ||
| Line 7: | Line 6: | ||
Based on CzechOut's comments, the historical category will be deleted, and it can only be created if/when we have a clear definition and a category name that doesn't violate [[Tardis:Category naming conventions]]. | Based on CzechOut's comments, the historical category will be deleted, and it can only be created if/when we have a clear definition and a category name that doesn't violate [[Tardis:Category naming conventions]]. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20171230034337-5791028/20180101045817-1432718]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 23:53, 27 April 2023
Actually, this was addressed by User:CzechOut in Thread:220978, in which his closing argument states:
- "Pseudo-historical and historical stories categories will be deleted, since we don't actually have a definition for them. And if we ever do get a definition, the same stories will probably not be included in the cat. Best to slash, burn, and recreate the categories."
The thread mentioned was an attempt to revive the pseudo-historical category, which was deleted per Thread:218056.
Based on CzechOut's comments, the historical category will be deleted, and it can only be created if/when we have a clear definition and a category name that doesn't violate Tardis:Category naming conventions.
