User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-6032121-20200517150418/@comment-6032121-20200607224534: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-6032121-20200517150418/@comment-6032121-20200607224534'''
As I mentioned at [[Talk:Vincent and the Doctor's Gallery (webcast)]], the thing is that this Wiki calls any licensed out-of-universe-focused video product a "(documentary)", in terms of dabbing anyway. This may not accord with common usage, but it's what this Wiki goes with, much like our perhaps-questionable description of the ''Mr Men'' books as "(novel)"s. And it is in this sense that we call them "documentaries" in these conversations. (If you have an alternative terms you'd like us to use, be my guest!)
As I mentioned at [[Talk:Vincent and the Doctor's Gallery (webcast)]], the thing is that this Wiki calls any licensed out-of-universe-focused video product a "(documentary)", in terms of dabbing anyway. This may not accord with common usage, but it's what this Wiki goes with, much like our perhaps-questionable description of the ''Mr Men'' books as "(novel)"s. And it is in this sense that we call them "documentaries" in these conversations. (If you have an alternative terms you'd like us to use, be my guest!)
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20200517150418-6032121/20200607224534-6032121]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 00:06, 28 April 2023

As I mentioned at Talk:Vincent and the Doctor's Gallery (webcast), the thing is that this Wiki calls any licensed out-of-universe-focused video product a "(documentary)", in terms of dabbing anyway. This may not accord with common usage, but it's what this Wiki goes with, much like our perhaps-questionable description of the Mr Men books as "(novel)"s. And it is in this sense that we call them "documentaries" in these conversations. (If you have an alternative terms you'd like us to use, be my guest!)