User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-9435571-20131123214400/@comment-27026537-20131125001515: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
"&$%")£ didnt post properly. i think (£&%^( | "&$%")£ didnt post properly. i think (£&%^( | ||
THe issue would be that whether we like it or not (and i understand where your coming from), BBC seems to be going via point 2, although as the 11th by what they call, later considers himself the 12th, this creates an issue for Capaldi's Doctor (which is where MEWIET and others spectacularly missed what I was trying to say), | THe issue would be that whether we like it or not (and i understand where your coming from), BBC seems to be going via point 2, although as the 11th by what they call, later considers himself the 12th, this creates an issue for Capaldi's Doctor (which is where MEWIET and others spectacularly missed what I was trying to say), | ||
if they don't skip 12. then it won't match any of your 3 points... | if they don't skip 12. then it won't match any of your 3 points... | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20131123214400-9435571/20131125001515-27026537]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 00:20, 28 April 2023
"&$%")£ didnt post properly. i think (£&%^(
THe issue would be that whether we like it or not (and i understand where your coming from), BBC seems to be going via point 2, although as the 11th by what they call, later considers himself the 12th, this creates an issue for Capaldi's Doctor (which is where MEWIET and others spectacularly missed what I was trying to say), if they don't skip 12. then it won't match any of your 3 points...
