User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161222064850/@comment-20607870-20161222105142: Difference between revisions
m (SOTO moved page User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161222064850/@comment-20607870-20161222105142 to User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates 1/@comment-1272640-20161222064850/@comment-20607870-20161222105142: Preparing for split. Edit history will be retained at Inclusion debates 1.) |
m (SOTO moved page User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates 1/@comment-1272640-20161222064850/@comment-20607870-20161222105142 to User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161222064850/@comment-20607870-20161222105142 over redirect: I didn't want subpages moved.) |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 03:18, 4 May 2023
Thefartydoctor wrote: You must bear in mind one simple thing: 'Call the Midwife is a part of Looking for Pudsey, through the inclusion of Sister Julienne. Redmayne himself phones the character and not the actor. You have to realise that if we include this as valid, then we have to consider the Call the Midwife Universe valid and part of the Whoniverse. As the two are highly incompatible, it's highly unlikely that Whovians will take this lightly haha.
The only thing that could save this story was if Moffat states that Mel and Sue manage to patch Redmayne through from his universe to the DWU... for a silly sketch that was for charity, it's too much hassle haha.
We don't have to consider all of CTM, just what we see in the DWU as with Death's Head.
