Tech, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators, threadmoderator
113,918
edits
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (SOTO moved page User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates 1/@comment-1272640-20161222080541 to User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161222080541 over redirect: I didn't want subpages moved.) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{retitle|Inclusion debates/Other Doctor Who Unbound stories - should we deem them invalid or just alternate universes?}} | |||
We've never had a formal discussion about ''Doctor Who Unbound'' releases' validity as a whole. Given that the Warner incarnation has already been deemed valid but from a different universe, it's not part of this discussion. | We've never had a formal discussion about ''Doctor Who Unbound'' releases' validity as a whole. Given that the Warner incarnation has already been deemed valid but from a different universe, it's not part of this discussion. | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Essentially, this is just one change: The whole of ''Doctor Who Unbound'' would be considered alternate universes, rather than wholly invalid. | Essentially, this is just one change: The whole of ''Doctor Who Unbound'' would be considered alternate universes, rather than wholly invalid. | ||
Any thoughts on this proposal? | Any thoughts on this proposal? | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20161222080541-1272640]]</noinclude> |
edits