User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161222080541: Difference between revisions
m (SOTO moved page User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161222080541 to User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates 1/@comment-1272640-20161222080541: Preparing for split. Edit history will be retained at Inclusion debates 1.) |
m (SOTO moved page User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates 1/@comment-1272640-20161222080541 to User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161222080541 over redirect: I didn't want subpages moved.) |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 03:18, 4 May 2023
We've never had a formal discussion about Doctor Who Unbound releases' validity as a whole. Given that the Warner incarnation has already been deemed valid but from a different universe, it's not part of this discussion.
I have a slightly different proposal:
He Jests at Scars..., Sustainable Energy/Full Fathom Five, Auld Mortality/The Innocents/A Storm of Angels, Exile, and Deadline are each set in alternate universes. They're not invalid, they are treated the same as the Unbound stories featuring David Warner. The whole point of Doctor Who Unbound is what-ifs, similar to DC's Elseworlds. It's not this didn't happen in any universe. It's that the installments depict various parallel universes detached from N-Space, a la The Unbound Universe says for Sympathy for the Devil/Masters of War.
Essentially, this is just one change: The whole of Doctor Who Unbound would be considered alternate universes, rather than wholly invalid.
Any thoughts on this proposal?
