228,839
edits
More actions
Forum:Temporary forums/Incarnation naming standards (view source)
Revision as of 05:02, 12 May 2023
, 12 May 2023SV7 moved page Tardis:Forum:Temporary forums/Archive/Incarnation naming standards to Forum:Temporary forums/Incarnation naming standards: Bot: Moved page
NateBumber (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
m (SV7 moved page Tardis:Forum:Temporary forums/Archive/Incarnation naming standards to Forum:Temporary forums/Incarnation naming standards: Bot: Moved page) |
||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{retitle|{{SUBPAGENAME}}}}[[Category: | {{retitle|{{SUBPAGENAME}}}} | ||
{{archive}}[[Category:Discussions without clear resolution|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]] | |||
== Where we stand == | == Where we stand == | ||
<div class="tech">I don't think an OP is necessary for this thread, as it is a continuation of the discussion which started at [[Talk:First Morbius]] before the resurrection of the Forums in their present, ‘Temporary’ form. It's a discussion that should, in an ideal world, always have belonged to the Forums, so let's relocate it there now and do this properly. People who intend to participate in this discussion '''should ideally read through the backlog at that talk page''', but I will proceed to summarise the main points of contention. | <div class="tech">I don't think an OP is necessary for this thread, as it is a continuation of the discussion which started at [[Talk:First Morbius]] before the resurrection of the Forums in their present, ‘Temporary’ form. It's a discussion that should, in an ideal world, always have belonged to the Forums, so let's relocate it there now and do this properly. People who intend to participate in this discussion '''should ideally read through the backlog at that talk page''', but I will proceed to summarise the main points of contention. | ||
| Line 26: | Line 27: | ||
I'm disappointed that this thread was opened in the way it was, especially since my last messages on [[Talk:First Morbius]] were so explicitly framed as personal notes for an overhauled proposal and opening post. As it is, the OP above inaccurately depicts my proposal as centered around concerns which I had explicitly disregarded or intended to rephrase. I don't think I'll have the time this week to write up my version, and in the meanwhile the three week window will tick towards its end; it would be unfair of me to demand that the clock be reset once I finish my draft. I move that this be closed as '''Unresolved.''' – [[User:NateBumber|n8]] ([[User talk:NateBumber|☎]]) 03:38, 19 February 2023 (UTC) | I'm disappointed that this thread was opened in the way it was, especially since my last messages on [[Talk:First Morbius]] were so explicitly framed as personal notes for an overhauled proposal and opening post. As it is, the OP above inaccurately depicts my proposal as centered around concerns which I had explicitly disregarded or intended to rephrase. I don't think I'll have the time this week to write up my version, and in the meanwhile the three week window will tick towards its end; it would be unfair of me to demand that the clock be reset once I finish my draft. I move that this be closed as '''Unresolved.''' – [[User:NateBumber|n8]] ([[User talk:NateBumber|☎]]) 03:38, 19 February 2023 (UTC) | ||
:Additionally, going forward it might be a good rule of thumb that opening posts should be written by users who actually support the proposal in question. – [[User:NateBumber|n8]] ([[User talk:NateBumber|☎]]) 03:46, 19 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
::I think this is a reasonable procedural objection. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 04:14, 19 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
::: Agreed.{{User:SOTO/sig}} 08:18, 19 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
: I've gotta agree with you there n8, I was really quite surprised to see this thread opened not by you, but presumed you'd been contacted? As it appears not, I agree with your call to '''unresolved''' until a future thread you actually get to author [[User:Cousin Ettolrhc|Cousin Ettolrhc]] [[User talk:Cousin Ettolrhc|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 07:47, 19 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
:::: Fair enough. I don't think a general policy against other people writing the OP is a good idea (multiple people have ben just fine with that), but this wasn't really that in any case — I thought that, as a continuation of an ongoing discussion, this didn't need an "OP" at all. I hadn't realised that you wished to restart it in full. Sorry! '''Yes, shelving this until you can restart it as you meant to sounds fair enough.''' (Naturally, another proposal will not be necessary for this, just hit us up on the talk page as soon as you have an OP and we'll launch it.) [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']] [[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]] 12:04, 19 February 2023 (UTC) | |||