Forum:Disputed Companions: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Actually, I'm an idiot; Lynda Moss is in the template. Never mind. --[[User:Falcotron|Falcotron]] 05:17, May 23, 2010 (UTC) | Actually, I'm an idiot; Lynda Moss is in the template. Never mind. --[[User:Falcotron|Falcotron]] 05:17, May 23, 2010 (UTC) | ||
If they're disputed, why should they be in the template? That should be for just undisputed companions. --[[User:Golden Monkey|Golden Monkey]] 05:48, May 23, 2010 (UTC) | If they're disputed, why should they be in the template? That should be for just undisputed companions. After all, you could argue ''anyone'' is a companion. --[[User:Golden Monkey|Golden Monkey]] 05:48, May 23, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 05:49, 23 May 2010
Index → Panopticon → Disputed Companions
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
Many "disputed companions" from List of companions appear in the companion template for their relevant Doctor, but at least some (such as Lynda Moss) do not. This should probably be made consistent, but I don't want to go searching through all of them to fix it until I know which way to fix it. --Falcotron 05:14, May 23, 2010 (UTC)
Actually, I'm an idiot; Lynda Moss is in the template. Never mind. --Falcotron 05:17, May 23, 2010 (UTC)
If they're disputed, why should they be in the template? That should be for just undisputed companions. After all, you could argue anyone is a companion. --Golden Monkey 05:48, May 23, 2010 (UTC)
