Forum:The Periodic Adventures of Señor 105: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit
Line 5: Line 5:
== Discussion ==
== Discussion ==
That could work. I do think this is the only time an entire series hasn't been covered due to ''apparent'' authorial intent and yet it failed none of [[T:VS]]... {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 07:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
That could work. I do think this is the only time an entire series hasn't been covered due to ''apparent'' authorial intent and yet it failed none of [[T:VS]]... {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 07:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
:Well, except for R4. Previous discussion is [[Thread:117545]] at [[User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon I]] and also a deleted thread [[Forum:Inclusion debate:Señor 105]]. Thread is arguably precedent that this thread should be deleted as well - depending on how badly we mess up their SEO. We messed it up so bad in 2012 that Czech purged the thread so they didn't have a random wiki thread above their actual book. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 08:05, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:05, 28 June 2023

IndexInclusion debates → The Periodic Adventures of Señor 105
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.

This wiki currently does not cover The Periodic Adventures of Señor 105, despite being a spinoff of Iris Wildthyme, because its creator, Cody Schell asked for it not to be covered. However, I've seen at least two users say that they believe this to be because he misunderstood the scope of this wiki. From what I've seen, I think this is the case and that the series should be both covered and valid. I think the ideal thing to do would be to get into contact with Schell and explain to him that this wiki covers things which are only narrowly tied to Doctor Who. Cgl1999 07:05, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Discussion

That could work. I do think this is the only time an entire series hasn't been covered due to apparent authorial intent and yet it failed none of T:VS...

07:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Well, except for R4. Previous discussion is Thread:117545 at User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon I and also a deleted thread Forum:Inclusion debate:Señor 105. Thread is arguably precedent that this thread should be deleted as well - depending on how badly we mess up their SEO. We messed it up so bad in 2012 that Czech purged the thread so they didn't have a random wiki thread above their actual book. Najawin 08:05, 28 June 2023 (UTC)