Category talk:The Pilot Episode images: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m (Epsilon the Eternal moved page Category talk:"The Pilot Episode" images to Category talk:The Pilot Episode images without leaving a redirect) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:::: Perhaps it's because of the quotation marks? I can't see how that could be an issue, but out of everything, that would probably be it. Regardless, if it was to be restored, I'd say the category should be [[:Category:The Pilot Episode images]] or [[:Category:The Pilot Episode home video images]] or something. <div style="background-color:#0E234E; border: solid 0.5px gold; display: inline; white-space: nowrap;">[[doctorwho:user:Epsilon the Eternal|<span style="background:#0E234E; color:white"><code>Epsilon</code></span>]][[doctorwho:user talk:Epsilon the Eternal|📯]] [[doctorwho:special:Contributions/Epsilon the Eternal|📂]]</div> 12:26, 29 August 2022 (UTC) | :::: Perhaps it's because of the quotation marks? I can't see how that could be an issue, but out of everything, that would probably be it. Regardless, if it was to be restored, I'd say the category should be [[:Category:The Pilot Episode images]] or [[:Category:The Pilot Episode home video images]] or something. <div style="background-color:#0E234E; border: solid 0.5px gold; display: inline; white-space: nowrap;">[[doctorwho:user:Epsilon the Eternal|<span style="background:#0E234E; color:white"><code>Epsilon</code></span>]][[doctorwho:user talk:Epsilon the Eternal|📯]] [[doctorwho:special:Contributions/Epsilon the Eternal|📂]]</div> 12:26, 29 August 2022 (UTC) | ||
::::: Since my last reply, I know of at least [[:Doctor Susan Pilot.jpg|one more image]] from The Pilot Episode uploaded onto the Wiki. As we have at least four images to satisfy [[Tardis:Rule of three]], and no apparent/legitimate reason that this category could be causing technical issues, which seems ''highly'' unlikely, this category should be restored. {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 12:50, 16 January 2023 (UTC) | ::::: Since my last reply, I know of at least [[:File:Doctor Susan Pilot.jpg|one more image]] from The Pilot Episode uploaded onto the Wiki. As we have at least four images to satisfy [[Tardis:Rule of three]], and no apparent/legitimate reason that this category could be causing technical issues, which seems ''highly'' unlikely, this category should be restored. {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 12:50, 16 January 2023 (UTC) | ||
:::::: Frankly, if The Pilot Episode is a "story" or not doesn't matter! We have a ridiculous amount of images on this website, and we need categories to exist so our editors can find what we already have. I think we should have categories for cereal boxes and pinball machines, just because they are things that we have images of that need to be catalogued! | |||
:::::: So I think we obviously need this back right away! [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]][[User Talk:OttselSpy25|🤙☎️]] 14:34, 7 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
::::::: I utterly agree there, I think deleting it on such ground doesn't make much sense, and having those images on the wiki ''is'' useful, and after all, editors and casual reader alike benefits from having a category listing all the images from the pilot episode. I think this should be reinstated as well! [[User:Liria10|Liria10]] [[User talk:Liria10|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 14:41, 7 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:50, 9 August 2023
Deletion[[edit source]]
I have multiple reasons why I feel that the deletion of this category is unjustified.
- Firstly, it does not remotely make sense that something not being a story doesn't justify an image category; something can lack a narrative and still provide images that should be categorised.
- Secondly, invalid or not, this is objectively a story. There is a plot, and it essentially being one long deleted scene doesn't change that fact.
- Thirdly, the rationale that the category caused problems doesn't make sense, as it was a category like any other.
- Fourth, it being a "filmed rehearsal" still constitutes a story that has been made available to watch on home media. Regardless of the context of it's production, it is still a story — not like it even matters as non-narrative stuff can have image categories.
- Fifth, the statement that the category merely contained images of home media covers is incorrect — not that even if this was true, it would still merit the existence of this category. There are several relevant to this story that aren't covers, such as:
For the reasons I outlined, I summarily request this category restored. I can only wish this deletion had any least been discussed here, first, else this bother may have been avoided.
21:46, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- Ok first of all, as a disclaimer, I'm not the admin who deleted this category. However, sometimes actions have to be taken because of technical issues (and as the least technical admin, and, probably, user, I can't be more specific), and they don't require community consensus. So if there are technical issues caused by the category, it probably won't be reinstated. Hopefully User:CzechOut will give more details, but for now I just wanted to explain the basic policy. Shambala108 ☎ 21:57, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- Oh of course, if there is a valid technical issue, that is easily fair reason. Only concerns I have is that this category appeared to be no different from any other, and @CzechOut didn't detail it in his edit summary. 22:02, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- I generally consider myself to be pretty well-versed in the technical side of the wiki and, while I do not know everything and certainly do not know what CzechOut was thinking, I can not think of a reason as to why this category might have been causing technical problems. Maybe there's some obscure issue with SMW but I don't know what it would be. Anyway, if there are no major issues, I support restoring this category. Bongo50 ☎ 12:13, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Perhaps it's because of the quotation marks? I can't see how that could be an issue, but out of everything, that would probably be it. Regardless, if it was to be restored, I'd say the category should be Category:The Pilot Episode images or Category:The Pilot Episode home video images or something. 12:26, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Since my last reply, I know of at least one more image from The Pilot Episode uploaded onto the Wiki. As we have at least four images to satisfy Tardis:Rule of three, and no apparent/legitimate reason that this category could be causing technical issues, which seems highly unlikely, this category should be restored. 12:50, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- Frankly, if The Pilot Episode is a "story" or not doesn't matter! We have a ridiculous amount of images on this website, and we need categories to exist so our editors can find what we already have. I think we should have categories for cereal boxes and pinball machines, just because they are things that we have images of that need to be catalogued!
- I utterly agree there, I think deleting it on such ground doesn't make much sense, and having those images on the wiki is useful, and after all, editors and casual reader alike benefits from having a category listing all the images from the pilot episode. I think this should be reinstated as well! Liria10 ☎ 14:41, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
