Forum:Coverage/validity: The LEGO Batman Movie: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary
Tag: visualeditor-wikitext
Tag: visualeditor-wikitext
Line 5: Line 5:
== Discussion ==
== Discussion ==
I do agree with coverage of the film, although I still think this would've been best after a ''LEGO Dimensions'' validation. [[User:Cookieboy 2005|Cookieboy 2005]] [[User talk:Cookieboy 2005|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:26, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
I do agree with coverage of the film, although I still think this would've been best after a ''LEGO Dimensions'' validation. [[User:Cookieboy 2005|Cookieboy 2005]] [[User talk:Cookieboy 2005|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:26, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
:[[Thread:211485]] at [[User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates 2]] is the relevant discussion. What does 564 actually say? [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:44, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:44, 24 August 2023

IndexInclusion debates → Coverage/validity: The LEGO Batman Movie
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.

The LEGO Batman Movie is not currently covered by this wiki because it was believed that the movie's use of the Daleks was unlicensed. However, DWM 564 confirms that they were, in fact, officially licensed. So I believe that it should be covered by this wiki, although I'm not sure about validity. I'm aware that Cookieboy 2005 planned to start an inclusion debate after our eventual LEGO Dimensions debate because he believes he could use Rule 4 By Proxy to argue for its validation if Dimensions is ruled valid, but I think we could just start another thread after that debate (assuming R4BP is still a ting, that is). Cgl1999 22:20, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Discussion

I do agree with coverage of the film, although I still think this would've been best after a LEGO Dimensions validation. Cookieboy 2005 22:26, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Thread:211485 at User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates 2 is the relevant discussion. What does 564 actually say? Najawin 22:44, 24 August 2023 (UTC)