Trusted
54,551
edits
More actions
Forum:Coverage/validity: The LEGO Batman Movie (view source)
Revision as of 23:34, 24 August 2023
, 24 August 2023no edit summary
OttselSpy25 (talk | contribs) Tag: 2017 source edit |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:: To clarify this point - yes the Daleks were always licensed. We had evidence they were licensed in the original forum, with quotes from the director. The idea that they are not licensed is just an untruth that was invented on the fly. But I don't think we gain anything by having a debate about this when it very clearly is a topic we aren't ready to tackle yet. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]][[User Talk:OttselSpy25|🤙☎️]] 23:22, 24 August 2023 (UTC) | :: To clarify this point - yes the Daleks were always licensed. We had evidence they were licensed in the original forum, with quotes from the director. The idea that they are not licensed is just an untruth that was invented on the fly. But I don't think we gain anything by having a debate about this when it very clearly is a topic we aren't ready to tackle yet. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]][[User Talk:OttselSpy25|🤙☎️]] 23:22, 24 August 2023 (UTC) | ||
::: (I, er, also agree with this; should definitely be covered, but it’s much easier and simpler doing ''LD'' first) [[User:Cookieboy 2005|Cookieboy 2005]] [[User talk:Cookieboy 2005|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 23:34, 24 August 2023 (UTC) | |||