Trusted
25,401
edits
More actions
The Doctor's trial (The Juror's Story) (edit)
Revision as of 08:47, 6 September 2023
, 6 September 2023→The trial
m (Moving to bottom) |
Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|result = {{il|The [[First Doctor]] is declared "not guilty"}} | |result = {{il|The [[First Doctor]] is declared "not guilty"}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
In the [[summer]] of [[1963]], the [[First Doctor]] was | In the [[summer]] of [[1963]], the [[First Doctor]] was put on '''[[trial]]''' in [[London]] for the murder of a young girl called [[Roberta Sampson]]. He was tried under the name "Dr. Foreman". | ||
== History == | == History == | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
After the jury retired to discuss the [[verdict]], the Fifth Doctor argued that the killing of Roberta Sampson by Dr Foreman had been in self-defence. While the other jurors expressed their doubt, he later backed up his claim with evidence presented at the trial, suggesting that it was proof that Sampson was a [[werewolf]]. | After the jury retired to discuss the [[verdict]], the Fifth Doctor argued that the killing of Roberta Sampson by Dr Foreman had been in self-defence. While the other jurors expressed their doubt, he later backed up his claim with evidence presented at the trial, suggesting that it was proof that Sampson was a [[werewolf]]. | ||
Without the other jurors knowing or noticing, the coming days saw several of the Jurors | Without the other jurors knowing or noticing, the coming days saw several of the Jurors replaced by further incarnations of the Doctor, including the [[Third Doctor]] (under the name of "Dr. Noble"), the [[Eighth Doctor]] ("Dr. Bowman"), and the [[Second Doctor]] ("Dr. Mason"). Each Doctor presented their logical arguments for the existence of werewolves, and evidence that werewolves were involved in this instance, with more and more jurists preferring a "not guilty" verdict with each passing day. | ||
Indeed, the eventual verdict of the trial was "not guilty", and at its conclusion the First Doctor was rushed at by his granddaughter Susan, and the pair [[hug|embraced]]. While leaving the building, the juror Dr. Harris became disorientated. The Eighth Doctor helped to steady him with a hand on his shoulder, saying: | |||
{{Quote|This is the thing people just don't get about time travel - once you let yourself think, "Oh, it's all right, if it goes wrong I'll just hop back and fix it", you never stop and, before you know it, you've overwritten the timelines so many times they're all sort of falling to bits before your eyes.|The [[Eighth Doctor]] explaining the influence of time travel on the trial.|The Juror's Story (short story)}} | {{Quote|This is the thing people just don't get about time travel - once you let yourself think, "Oh, it's all right, if it goes wrong I'll just hop back and fix it", you never stop and, before you know it, you've overwritten the timelines so many times they're all sort of falling to bits before your eyes.|The [[Eighth Doctor]] explaining the influence of time travel on the trial.|The Juror's Story (short story)}} | ||
The Eighth Doctor then removed Dr. Harris from his timeline ([[PROSE]]: ''[[The Juror's Story (short story)|The Juror's Story]]'') in order to protect the [[Web of Time]]. (''[[Repercussions... (short story)|Repercussions...]]'') | The Eighth Doctor then removed Dr. Harris from his timeline ([[PROSE]]: ''[[The Juror's Story (short story)|The Juror's Story]]'') in order to protect the [[Web of Time]]. ([[PROSE]]: ''[[Repercussions... (short story)|Repercussions...]]'') | ||
{{TitleSort}} | {{TitleSort}} | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
[[Category:Trials in which the Doctor was the defendant]] | [[Category:Trials in which the Doctor was the defendant]] | ||
[[Category:20th century Earth history]] | [[Category:20th century Earth history]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Multi-Doctor Events]] | ||