68,671
edits
More actions
no edit summary
(New page: {{Forumheader|Panopticon}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> I've noticed a bit of a trend for useless wikiing in a few a...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Obviously where there ''is'' specific Who-based information which shouldn't go in a general-interest wiki (for example, the series' version of Shakespeare, or the British Prime Minister) we should have an article. I'm just wondering if there's an established policy on where to draw the line in this kind of situation? --[[User:Gai-jin|Gai-jin]] 14:39, 5 May 2007 (UTC) | Obviously where there ''is'' specific Who-based information which shouldn't go in a general-interest wiki (for example, the series' version of Shakespeare, or the British Prime Minister) we should have an article. I'm just wondering if there's an established policy on where to draw the line in this kind of situation? --[[User:Gai-jin|Gai-jin]] 14:39, 5 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
:I'm not sure there is (but thank you! I thought I was the only one staring at some of the things and thinking 'huh'?). I guess it's more a judgement call than anything really concrete. There have been a few things in the forum here and there. In the Manual of Style there's a section on [[Tardis:Manual of style#Links|Links]] but that's about it. Maybe it could be changed to Links/Wikifying, just to clarify it up a bit and then add...well something about justifyable use of a link or...something like that. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 16:01, 5 May 2007 (UTC) | |||