Forum:Extensions and Us.

Index → The Panopticon → Extensions and Us.

Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.

Opening Post

So a thought occurred to me during Forum:MTG Minutiae when we added the Scryfall extension. What other helpful extensions are we missing out on that we might wish to add to this wiki? The extension in question was prompted by a specific problem, sure, but are there some that are just generically beneficial to our wiki as it currently exists that we might wish to ask for? I forgot about this question, but other events in my life brought me back to this question today, so I took a quick perusal through the stable mediawiki extensions. I'm sure there are others I missed, but there are some here that are quite interesting still, that I think we should consider adding.

• Extension:SiteMetrics - Just a generically useful extension for admins and other interested parties to have access to, if they don't already.

• Extension:RatePage - I think this one has real potential to find pages that could use a lot of work from the perspective of our readers vs ones that they quite enjoy. One needs to account for biases, but I think there's some real use to this extension.

• Extension:Network - This is literally the perfect way to represent nonlinear stories. Try it! You can click on the nodes and it will take you to subpages. The only concern I have is for mobile. It's exactly what we should do if it works for mobile and we can add it.

• Extension:GoogleTranslate - This one's a bit tricky and we should talk to our foreign language partners over it. They do fantastic work, of course, and google translate absolutely doesn't convey the correct nuances and tone, even if it were to do a perfect translation, but there's just so many of our pages that don't have versions in various languages.

• Extension:HitCounters - To a certain extent this will only tell us what we already know, but in the short term there will absolutely be pages that get flurries of activity for specific reasons and tracking that will be very interesting. In addition, knowing precisely the page views we get each month will be helpful for all sorts of reasons.

• Extension:CiteThisPage - Not sure about this one, need to look more into the details. But giving details on how to cite wiki pages + the things we're citing might actually be useful?

• Extension:AJAXPoll - Let's just be honest, having a poll extension would be occasionally helpful. I prefer discussion, but some things really can be settled with just a poll. I'd also like to get some form of Kudos back, but that doesn't seem doable for these forums.

All in all, I think there's real potential here to improve the wiki in with these extensions, some of them in small ways, some massively, increasing the potential for reader feedback and our reach to people we don't normally interact with. Najawin ☎ 08:28, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Discussion

On the most part, this is not possible. Fandom only lets wikis request a small number of extensions that they support. Most of these are listed at w:Help:Extensions and w:c:Help:Extensions (those listed only on the second page may not all be available to us). I've gone through these lists before and I don't think there are any that would be particuarly useful to us. As such, unless Fandom starts supporting some more extensions, I can't see many, if any, more being enabled here. Bongo50 ☎ 14:47, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

I can't comment on whether the latter is an exhaustive list, but the former decidedly isn't. It literally says "This is a non-comprehensive list". Or, rather, the latter plus the former, since the latter explicitly says that they don't use comments or SMW, which are present on some Fandom wikis. So we just can't know until we ask. But, yes, I am aware that all of these are non-standard. Najawin ☎ 20:15, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

These aren't exhaustive lists, but a lot of the extensions not listed on either aren't interesting. Scroll down Special:Version to see what I mean. The second list is the extensions that were available on Gamepedia before that merged with Fandom. Gamepedia tended to allow more freedom with extensions than Fandom, so that's where most of the interesting ones are found, even if it is missing a few that are available after merging with Fandom. As a rule, if you can find a wiki on Fandom with a given extension, than it may be available, and if you can't, it's almost certainly not. To go into a bit of detail on a few specific extensions, Extension:SiteMetrics and Extension:HitCounters have overlap with the admin-only Special:Analytics (which Fandom doesn't like admins sharing details of), so I can't see them enabling those. As far as I'm aware, Extension:AJAXPoll (or something similar) used to be available but no longer is. I don't know why. Bongo50 ☎ 21:42, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

HitCounters is a more robust version of a feature that existed as of, what, 2.5 years ago? (It used to be possible for any user to see the most popular pages, but the migration to UCP removed it.) It's possible they'd say no. But I don't think it's cut and dry. But at the end of the day if these aren't likely to work they aren't likely to work. Najawin ☎ 21:59, 27 January 2024 (UTC)