Talk:November 2023 UFO incident: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m (BananaClownMan moved page Talk:Destruction of London to Talk:The Meep's attempted destruction of London: Renaming to a more precise name based on talk page discussion) |
m (Epsilon the Eternal moved page Talk:The Meep's attempted destruction of London to Talk:Destruction of London over redirect: Really should check the novelisation first. Sorry I haven't gotten around to it.) |
(No difference)
| |
Revision as of 05:02, 4 February 2024
Title
The name "Destruction of London" comes from the Fourteenth Doctor himself. While yes, London wasn't actually destroyed, it isn't difficult to phrase it in the article as "the Meep's attempted Destruction of London". There isn't another name given for the conflict, unless if you wanna make something conjectural.
15:43, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, I also have to agree here. The name makes perfect sense. Danniesen ☎ 22:10, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- A conjectural title is better than a misleading one. Might I suggest "Activation of the Meep's ship"? BananaClownMan ☎ 09:42, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Alternatively, we go for the middle ground; we partially conjecturally name this page attempted destruction of London? 14:01, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- A good compromise. Since they have been many attampts to destroy London, though, might I suggest a more specific title, like "The Meep's attempted destruction of London" or "Attempted destruction of London (2023)"? BananaClownMan ☎ 14:14, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- The former sounds good if a little long.
- What I haven’t considering though is The Star Beast novelisation [+]Loading...["The Star Beast (novelisation)","''The Star Beast'' novelisation"]... before we do any page renames, shouldn't we check the novelisation first? 14:22, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- If there is one there. I don't have a copy of the book, so I can't check, myself. BananaClownMan ☎ 14:26, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- It seems we are in agreement that "The Meep's attempted destruction of London", though longwinded, is the better fitting title. Did you find a better alternative in the novelisation? BananaClownMan ☎ 15:13, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
