Talk:November 2023 UFO incident: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m (Epsilon the Eternal moved page Talk:Destruction of London to Talk:November 2023 UFO incident) |
(→Title) Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
: It seems we are in agreement that "The Meep's attempted destruction of London", though longwinded, is the better fitting title. Did you find a better alternative in the novelisation? [[User:BananaClownMan|BananaClownMan]] [[User talk:BananaClownMan|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 15:13, 29 January 2024 (UTC) | : It seems we are in agreement that "The Meep's attempted destruction of London", though longwinded, is the better fitting title. Did you find a better alternative in the novelisation? [[User:BananaClownMan|BananaClownMan]] [[User talk:BananaClownMan|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 15:13, 29 January 2024 (UTC) | ||
:: Sorry it took me so long, I got sidetracked. Haven't read all of the novelisation, but I did find that the [[Space Defence Centre]] named it the "November 2023 UFO incident", which should work as the page name. {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 05:46, 4 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
::: And it neatly covers the entire events of ''The Star Beast'', satisfying all parties. [[User:BananaClownMan|BananaClownMan]] [[User talk:BananaClownMan|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 05:49, 4 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 05:49, 4 February 2024
Title[[edit source]]
The name "Destruction of London" comes from the Fourteenth Doctor himself. While yes, London wasn't actually destroyed, it isn't difficult to phrase it in the article as "the Meep's attempted Destruction of London". There isn't another name given for the conflict, unless if you wanna make something conjectural.
15:43, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, I also have to agree here. The name makes perfect sense. Danniesen ☎ 22:10, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- A conjectural title is better than a misleading one. Might I suggest "Activation of the Meep's ship"? BananaClownMan ☎ 09:42, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Alternatively, we go for the middle ground; we partially conjecturally name this page attempted destruction of London? 14:01, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- A good compromise. Since they have been many attampts to destroy London, though, might I suggest a more specific title, like "The Meep's attempted destruction of London" or "Attempted destruction of London (2023)"? BananaClownMan ☎ 14:14, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- The former sounds good if a little long.
- What I haven’t considering though is The Star Beast novelisation [+]Loading...["The Star Beast (novelisation)","''The Star Beast'' novelisation"]... before we do any page renames, shouldn't we check the novelisation first? 14:22, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- If there is one there. I don't have a copy of the book, so I can't check, myself. BananaClownMan ☎ 14:26, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- It seems we are in agreement that "The Meep's attempted destruction of London", though longwinded, is the better fitting title. Did you find a better alternative in the novelisation? BananaClownMan ☎ 15:13, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry it took me so long, I got sidetracked. Haven't read all of the novelisation, but I did find that the Space Defence Centre named it the "November 2023 UFO incident", which should work as the page name. 05:46, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- And it neatly covers the entire events of The Star Beast, satisfying all parties. BananaClownMan ☎ 05:49, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
