Forum:Character Pages: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{Archive|Panopticon archives}}[[Category:Policy explanations]] | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
Is there a policy on character pages? From what I've seen, if a character has a name, then they get a page. Doesn't matter if they have any lines (for TV), or what media the are in, or what role (if any) they have. If a character has a name, they get a page. Is that how it works? -- [[User:Ripmssmith|Rest In Peace Sarah Jane]] \ [[User_talk:Ripmssmith|Talk to me!]] 13:34, April 26, 2011 (UTC) | Is there a policy on character pages? From what I've seen, if a character has a name, then they get a page. Doesn't matter if they have any lines (for TV), or what media the are in, or what role (if any) they have. If a character has a name, they get a page. Is that how it works? -- [[User:Ripmssmith|Rest In Peace Sarah Jane]] \ [[User_talk:Ripmssmith|Talk to me!]] 13:34, April 26, 2011 (UTC) | ||
: | :There isn't currently a specific policy, beyond the [[Tardis:Manual of Style]], [[Tardis:Layout guide]] and the [[Tardis:Guide to writing Individuals articles]]. | ||
:All in-universe individuals have articles, see [[:Category:Individuals]]. | |||
:Also in several cases individuals who do not have defined names also have articles, see [[:Category:Individuals with unknown names]]. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 14:09, April 26, 2011 (UTC) | :Also in several cases individuals who do not have defined names also have articles, see [[:Category:Individuals with unknown names]]. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 14:09, April 26, 2011 (UTC) | ||
::All characters should have pages. Even if they don't have lines. We have some page that have Character X was... and its only a sentence or two. If we have '''any''' information about a character, we create a page. A good example of these are characters from books, especially the [[Virgin New Adventures]], which have character pages that have one or two lines. Too me, not have a character page when we have a piece of information about, however small (bar the obvious X was a man, women, human etc), is like not creating a story page because 'nothing significant happened'. [[User:Mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]]\[[User talk:Mini-mitch|talk]] 15:18, April 26, 2011 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 01:51, 28 February 2024
Forums → Archive index → Panopticon archives → Character Pages
Is there a policy on character pages? From what I've seen, if a character has a name, then they get a page. Doesn't matter if they have any lines (for TV), or what media the are in, or what role (if any) they have. If a character has a name, they get a page. Is that how it works? -- Rest In Peace Sarah Jane \ Talk to me! 13:34, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
- There isn't currently a specific policy, beyond the Tardis:Manual of Style, Tardis:Layout guide and the Tardis:Guide to writing Individuals articles.
- All in-universe individuals have articles, see Category:Individuals.
- Also in several cases individuals who do not have defined names also have articles, see Category:Individuals with unknown names. --Tangerineduel / talk 14:09, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
- All characters should have pages. Even if they don't have lines. We have some page that have Character X was... and its only a sentence or two. If we have any information about a character, we create a page. A good example of these are characters from books, especially the Virgin New Adventures, which have character pages that have one or two lines. Too me, not have a character page when we have a piece of information about, however small (bar the obvious X was a man, women, human etc), is like not creating a story page because 'nothing significant happened'. Mini-mitch\talk 15:18, April 26, 2011 (UTC)