Forum:Is capitalisation enough to distinguish two articles?: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Created page with "{{Forumheader|Panopticon}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> I've just come across two articles I've never seen ...") |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{Archive|Panopticon archives}}[[Category:Discussions without clear resolution]] | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
I've just come across two articles I've never seen before and am curious what you guys think about the distinction between them: | I've just come across two articles I've never seen before and am curious what you guys think about the distinction between them: | ||
Latest revision as of 03:51, 28 February 2024
Forums → Archive index → Panopticon archives → Is capitalisation enough to distinguish two articles?
I've just come across two articles I've never seen before and am curious what you guys think about the distinction between them:
- Dark Planet is a novel
- dark planet is a type of planet
I've now put up disambig notes at the top of each article, but I wonder if that's enough of a distinction. Should it actually be Dark Planet (novel) and dark planet remaining at the planet? Or is the capital letter "P" enough to distinguish the two? I've never seen two articles on this wiki separated by just capitalisation, so we might want to include this case in the naming conventions section of the manual of style, once we decide how we want to handle it.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍
