Defence (legal): Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Created page with "{{Wikipediainfo|Defense (legal)}} Amnesia was not a '''defence''' in a court of law. (TV: {{cs|The Bounty Hunter (TV story)}}) Category:Law and order")
 
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Wikipediainfo|Defense (legal)}}
{{Wikipediainfo|Defense (legal)}}
[[Amnesia]] was not a '''defence''' in a [[court]] of [[law]]. ([[TV]]: {{cs|The Bounty Hunter (TV story)}})
[[Amnesia]] was not a '''defence''' in a [[court]] of [[law]]. ([[TV]]: {{cs|The Bounty Hunter (TV story)}})
[[The Valeyard]] believed that the [[Sixth Doctor]] was attempting to use amnesia as a defence during [[The Doctor's trial (The Mysterious Planet)|his trial]]. The Doctor confirmed that this was not the case. ([[TV]]: {{cs|Mindwarp (TV story)}}) When it came time for him to respond to the Valeyard's case, he made it clear that his defence was that his behaviour would improve. ([[TV]]: {{cs|Terror of the Vervoids (TV story)}})


[[Category:Law and order]]
[[Category:Law and order]]

Latest revision as of 21:02, 10 March 2024

Defence (legal)

Amnesia was not a defence in a court of law. (TV: The Bounty Hunter [+]Loading...["The Bounty Hunter (TV story)"])

The Valeyard believed that the Sixth Doctor was attempting to use amnesia as a defence during his trial. The Doctor confirmed that this was not the case. (TV: Mindwarp [+]Loading...["Mindwarp (TV story)"]) When it came time for him to respond to the Valeyard's case, he made it clear that his defence was that his behaviour would improve. (TV: Terror of the Vervoids [+]Loading...["Terror of the Vervoids (TV story)"])